Decarbonising Food: Rethinking the Way We Grow, Eat, and Live
- camilla bigler
- May 6
- 3 min read

When we talk about climate change, it's tempting to picture belching chimneys and petrol-fuelled engines. But behind the scenes, one of the biggest contributors to carbon emissions is something we all engage with every day: food.
The journey from soil to supermarket shelf – and eventually to our plates – is riddled with carbon-intensive processes. From fertilisers derived from fossil fuels to diesel-powered machinery, refrigerated transport, plastic packaging, and food waste in landfills, the emissions quickly add up. If food systems were a country, they’d be one of the top three emitters globally. So the question becomes: how do we decarbonise something so essential, so deeply woven into our cultures and economies?
I think the answer lies not in one sweeping change, but in rethinking the system as a whole. Start with farming. Industrial agriculture – for all its efficiency – has encouraged monocultures and heavy reliance on synthetic fertilisers and pesticides.
Moving towards regenerative agriculture could be a game-changer. It’s not just a trendy buzzword – it actually involves rebuilding soil health, using cover crops, minimising tillage, and letting nature do more of the work. Healthy soils store more carbon and produce more resilient crops. They also tend to reduce reliance on inputs that come with high carbon footprints.
Then there’s energy. Many food producers still rely on grid electricity sourced from fossil fuels, or diesel generators in rural areas. That’s where decentralised renewables – solar arrays, anaerobic digesters, and even wind – start to matter. If a farm can generate its own energy to run irrigation, refrigeration, and processing equipment, not only does it cut emissions, but it also builds resilience against volatile energy prices.
One thing I’ve found particularly interesting is the role of food waste. Globally, we waste around a third of all food produced. That’s a staggering amount, especially when you think about all the energy and emissions tied to producing something that ends up in the bin. Smarter logistics, local sourcing, and better data can help here – as can shifting consumer mindsets away from over-purchasing and towards valuing seasonal, imperfect produce.
Transport and packaging are often scrutinised, and rightly so. But the challenge isn’t just about miles travelled – it’s also about mode of transport and how products are stored. Chilled lorries guzzle power. Alternatives like rail, or ultra-local supply chains, are part of the solution. Packaging is trickier. It needs to preserve freshness and prevent waste, but that often comes at the cost of plastic. Biodegradable and reusable options are coming along, but the balance between convenience, hygiene, and sustainability is still being worked out.
Let’s not forget diets. I know this can get political, but reducing reliance on meat and dairy – particularly from industrial sources – can slash emissions. It doesn’t mean everyone has to go vegan, but a shift towards plant-based foods and alternative proteins can help reduce pressure on land and water while cutting emissions at scale.
And underpinning all of this is finance. Farmers and food producers often operate on tight margins and short timelines. If we’re serious about decarbonising food, then we need financial tools – subsidies, carbon credits, green loans – that support the long-term transition. The technology is there. The will is growing. But unless it becomes economically viable for those actually growing and processing our food, change will be slow.
Ultimately, food touches every part of our lives – our health, our communities, our economies, and our environment. Decarbonising it isn’t just a climate imperative; it’s an opportunity to build a more resilient, fairer, and healthier system. It’ll take cooperation, investment, and a cultural shift in how we think about what we eat – but it’s entirely possible. And frankly, it’s already underway.



Comments